How To Draw A 3d Graph

Suppose y'all want to plot $z = f(x, y)$ over the rectangle $[a, b] \times [c, d]$, i.e., for $a \leq ten \leq b$ and $c \leq y \leq d$, using a mesh grid of size $g \times due north$. I simple approach is to apply "orthogonal projection":

• Select a function and the rectangle over which you lot want to plot. Find or approximate the minimum and maximum values the part achieves.

• Tack down a canvass of newspaper on a drafting board. Using a T-square, $30$-$60$-$ninety$ triangle, and ruler, lay out a parallelogram on your newspaper with one side horizontal, the rectangular domain seen in perspective, and mark off the subdivision points along the outer edges ($m$ equal intervals in the $ten$-management and $northward$ equal intervals in the $y$-direction). Use the minimum and maximum values of the office to guess where on the paper the domain should be drawn, and to decide on the overall vertical scale of the plot.

  For correctness (see diagram beneath), permit's call the bottom edge of the parallelgram $ten = x_{0}$ and the left border $y = y_{0}$. (Depending on how the parallelogram is oriented, you might take $x_{0} = a$ or $b$, and $y_{0} = c$ or $d$.) Using a abrupt 6H pencil, subdivide the parallelogram (the domain) into an $k \times north$ filigree.

• Summate the pace sizes $$ \Delta x = \frac{b - a}{thousand},\qquad \Delta y = \frac{d - c}{n}. $$ (The formulas beneath presume the step sizes are positive, i.e., thet $x_{0} = a$ and $y_{0} = c$. The modifications should be fairly obvious if $10$ decreases from bottom to top and/or $y$ decreases from left to right.)

• To outcome subconscious line removal, we'll plot front to back. Summate the "front end row" values $$ f(x_{0}, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y),\qquad 1 \leq j \leq n. $$ Locate each signal $(x_{0}, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y)$ in your grid, measure upwardly or down to the advisable height, and put a dot at that location. When you're plotted these $n$ points, connect the dots from left to right with a 2B pencil.

• Now iterate the following pace, letting $i$ run from $1$ to $m$. Calculate the values $$ f(x_{0} + i\, \Delta x, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y),\qquad 1 \leq j \leq n. $$ Locate each indicate $(x_{0} + i\, \Delta x, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y)$ in your grid, and measure up or down to the appropriate height. When yous're plotted these $north$ points:

  • Describe ane row of "front-to-back" segments: For each $j = one, \dots, north$, connect the dot over $(x_{0} + (i - 1)\, \Delta x, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y)$ to the dot over $(x_{0} + i\, \Delta x, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y)$. (Use light lines or no lines if the segment lies behind a role of the surface you have already plotted.)

  • Draw the $i$th row: For each $j = 1, \dots, northward$, connect the dot over $(x_{0} + i\, \Delta x, y_{0} + j\, \Delta y)$ to the dot over $(x_{0} + i\, \Delta x, y_{0} + (j + 1)\, \Delta y)$. (Again, use light lines or no lines if the segment lies behind a role of the surface yous have already plotted.)

Speaking from experience, the process takes (with a calculator) about eight hours for a $20 \times twenty$ mesh. It's doubtless faster to tabulate all the values of $f$ at the mesh points, then to plot points by reading from the table. (I was impetuous as a student, and alternately calculated 1 value and plotted one indicate.)

The diagram shows (a computer-fatigued version of) the first function I plotted, shifted up to avoid overlap with the rectangular mesh in the domain. When you lot're really plotting on paper, you probably don't want to waste matter the vertical space, and then will have to describe the grid lightly and plot over it.

Source: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2257410/is-there-a-way-to-draw-3d-graphs-on-paper

Posted by: masonexprind1993.blogspot.com

Share this post